For my own research.
*Note to self: it is damn hard to work through this. Nearly all researchers use base 60 to 'decipher' the number system and aspects of cuneiform. They know that the information they are interpreting must be in error, yet they have no other system of interpretation. VERY frustrating because I am finding myself constantly having to readjust my thinking; removing the number values the researchers use, place my own within its context, and use pattern sequencing to find a core to anchor on to. Not only that, but the more I investigate, the more it seems their system did not include the full 12 rows seen in the Extended Fibonacci Series (to get to the holy grail of Row 12).
They wrote left to right which I can adjust to on the fly simple enough.
THEY DIDN'T USE LINEAR NUMBER SEQUENCING. That is, on some of the earlier tablets showing astronomical associations, lunar visibility, cycles utilizing 360 degree increments (mainly Time denominations), the numeral system was as much as symbolic (perhaps even more-so) than utilizing linear thought systems. I have searched, and have concluded that researchers cannot separate their minds from spatial symbolic forms and the linear understanding of numbers we all grew up with.
Keep in mind:
8 generations from Creation Myth to World Deluge
Same as biblical information.
The impact of deciphering this original Mesopotamian number system would be of untold importance. The bible uses fragments of it. The Torah. Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Gnostics. The Essenes. And not just of historical importance or relevance, but I have found both the Extended Table and the Pattern Table directly match to harmonics and frequency rate resonance.
The f12 numbers align with Pythagorean concepts as well as Plato's work. The connections are so perfect I find it impossible to be coincidental. Outside my own work, some investigative mathematicians are seeing connections to Pythagorean geometry insights to early Mesopotamian geometries. Remember, these geometries are sacred and near god-like in their scope; defining celestial movements, planetary body diameters, velocity and orbital rates/patterns, and galactic cycles more than 25,920 years of process. And, Pythagoras found knowledge that was so worrying to him, that he created his own society of learning, with initiates having to takes oaths of secrecy upon death. It is said that the knowledge was too dangerous for the common uneducated man to have available. As peripheral proof, Pythagoras himself rarely wrote anything down at all for fear it would leak out into the public.
The f12 numbers are within the Vedic Calendar...EXACT numbers. All of them, exact with the exception of trailing 0's. Life of Brahmin years as well. The f12 numbers are in the Mayan Long Count number of days in their calendar. Exact. List of Kings in the Sumerian on the Weld-Blundell Prism, exact numbers. Platonic Solids and their respective total angular degrees of each...exact. Precession of the Equinoxes: exact including solar inclination and separation of years AND lunar cycles! Speaking of the lunar cycles, the Sumerian lunar visibility tablet has the exact same ratios and unit proportions to the tables, even dipping into the Extended Table that includes Thoth and the Eye of Horus fractions. Lastly for now, I just remembered that Thoth stole 5 days for the calendar year to go from 360 to 365. It is explained perfectly via the Extended Fibonacci Table.
I've got some fluid starting points that historians cannot accurately pin down because the number system in those eras was so different from the Base 10 we currently employ. They used a system that naturally defined reciprocals. It utilized the squares and sometimes cubes of numbers. There was no unit defined as '0' (zero). Researchers claim they used a fraction system. I see that they did not, and didn't need to. Whole numbers can be defined as parts of wholes, the parts being wholes themselves (the Holon concept).
It is a task to be a solo individual working on all this. I am thinking of doing a crash course in learning Hebrew. That should be of some value when looking at original 'languages' of Sumer, through the Assyrians and into Babylonia. Too much work...but the reward if I can crack the code and decipher the Pre-Roman systems of expression.
-Chad Adams
Side addition:
*Note to self: it is damn hard to work through this. Nearly all researchers use base 60 to 'decipher' the number system and aspects of cuneiform. They know that the information they are interpreting must be in error, yet they have no other system of interpretation. VERY frustrating because I am finding myself constantly having to readjust my thinking; removing the number values the researchers use, place my own within its context, and use pattern sequencing to find a core to anchor on to. Not only that, but the more I investigate, the more it seems their system did not include the full 12 rows seen in the Extended Fibonacci Series (to get to the holy grail of Row 12).
They wrote left to right which I can adjust to on the fly simple enough.
THEY DIDN'T USE LINEAR NUMBER SEQUENCING. That is, on some of the earlier tablets showing astronomical associations, lunar visibility, cycles utilizing 360 degree increments (mainly Time denominations), the numeral system was as much as symbolic (perhaps even more-so) than utilizing linear thought systems. I have searched, and have concluded that researchers cannot separate their minds from spatial symbolic forms and the linear understanding of numbers we all grew up with.
Keep in mind:
8 generations from Creation Myth to World Deluge
Same as biblical information.
The impact of deciphering this original Mesopotamian number system would be of untold importance. The bible uses fragments of it. The Torah. Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Gnostics. The Essenes. And not just of historical importance or relevance, but I have found both the Extended Table and the Pattern Table directly match to harmonics and frequency rate resonance.
The f12 numbers align with Pythagorean concepts as well as Plato's work. The connections are so perfect I find it impossible to be coincidental. Outside my own work, some investigative mathematicians are seeing connections to Pythagorean geometry insights to early Mesopotamian geometries. Remember, these geometries are sacred and near god-like in their scope; defining celestial movements, planetary body diameters, velocity and orbital rates/patterns, and galactic cycles more than 25,920 years of process. And, Pythagoras found knowledge that was so worrying to him, that he created his own society of learning, with initiates having to takes oaths of secrecy upon death. It is said that the knowledge was too dangerous for the common uneducated man to have available. As peripheral proof, Pythagoras himself rarely wrote anything down at all for fear it would leak out into the public.
The f12 numbers are within the Vedic Calendar...EXACT numbers. All of them, exact with the exception of trailing 0's. Life of Brahmin years as well. The f12 numbers are in the Mayan Long Count number of days in their calendar. Exact. List of Kings in the Sumerian on the Weld-Blundell Prism, exact numbers. Platonic Solids and their respective total angular degrees of each...exact. Precession of the Equinoxes: exact including solar inclination and separation of years AND lunar cycles! Speaking of the lunar cycles, the Sumerian lunar visibility tablet has the exact same ratios and unit proportions to the tables, even dipping into the Extended Table that includes Thoth and the Eye of Horus fractions. Lastly for now, I just remembered that Thoth stole 5 days for the calendar year to go from 360 to 365. It is explained perfectly via the Extended Fibonacci Table.
I've got some fluid starting points that historians cannot accurately pin down because the number system in those eras was so different from the Base 10 we currently employ. They used a system that naturally defined reciprocals. It utilized the squares and sometimes cubes of numbers. There was no unit defined as '0' (zero). Researchers claim they used a fraction system. I see that they did not, and didn't need to. Whole numbers can be defined as parts of wholes, the parts being wholes themselves (the Holon concept).
It is a task to be a solo individual working on all this. I am thinking of doing a crash course in learning Hebrew. That should be of some value when looking at original 'languages' of Sumer, through the Assyrians and into Babylonia. Too much work...but the reward if I can crack the code and decipher the Pre-Roman systems of expression.
-Chad Adams
Side addition:
| City | Ruler | Reign in Years | (Column Row) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eridu | Alulim | 28,800 | C20 R12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eridu | Alalgar | 36,000 | C25 R12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Badtibira | Enmenlu-Anna | 43,200 | C300 R12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enmengal-Anna | 28,800 | C20 R12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Divine Dumuzi | 36,000 | C25 R12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Larak | Ensipazi-Anna | 28,800 | C20 R12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sippar | Enmendur-Anna | 21,000 | C1000 R8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shuruppak | Ubar-Tutu | 18,600 | C6200 R4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment